Relationship network as a basis for efficient problem solving in clients with specific requirements

J. Except. People 2016, 5(2):95-104

Relationship network as a basis for efficient problem solving in clients with specific requirements

Petra Jurkovičová¹, Tatiana Čekanová²: ¹ Palacký University Olomouc, Faculty of Education, Institute of Special Education Studies, Žižkovo náměstí 5, 771 40 Olomouc, Czech Republic; ² Department of Special Pedagogy, Faculty of Education, University of Prešov in Prešov, 17. novembra 15, 080 01 Prešov, Slovak Republic

The article presents the current movement in the field of care for clients - persons with specific requirements included in the social services system or special education system. The paper presents the view of the basic philosophical and specified theoretical base for the use of dialogue and relationship networks as well as a practical example in form of an anticipation dialogue. In conclusion, the article provides reasons for efficiency of the application of anticipation dialogue in solving difficult situations of clients with specific requirements. Subsequently, recommendations for practice are specified considering the conditions specific for this client group.

Keywords: dialogue, networking, dialogical practice, client with specific requirements, anticipation dialogue.

Published: December 11, 2016 Show citation

Jurkovičová, P., & Čekanová, T. (2016). Relationship network as a basis for efficient problem solving in clients with specific requirements. Journal of Exceptional People, 5(9), 95-104

References

Anderson, H. (1997) Conversation, Language, and Posibilities. A postmodern approach to therapy. New York: Basic Books. 308 p.
Anderson, H. (2002) In the space between people: Seikkula's Open dialog approach. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28 (3), p. 279-281. Go to original source...
Anderson, H. (2003) Listening, Hearing and Speaking: Thoughts on the Relationship to Dialogue. Eighth Annual Open Dialogue Conference: What is Helpful in Treatment Dialogue? August 29th, 2003,Tornio, Finland.
Barge, Little, (2008) A Discursive Approach to Skillful Activity. Communication Theory, 18 (4), p. 505-534. Go to original source...
Hoffman, L. (2002) Family therapy: An intimate history. New York: Norton. 320 p.
McNamee, S. (2004) SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION AS PRACTICAL THEORY: Lessons for Practice and Reflection in Psychotherapy
Pare, D. - Larner, G. (2004). Critical Knowledge and Practice in Psychotherapy. New York: Haworth Press.
Rober (2002) Constructive Hypotesizing, Dialogic Understanding and the Therapist's Inner Conversation: Some Ideas about Knowing and Not Knowinginthe Family Therapy Session. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28 (4), p. 467-478. Go to original source...
Shotter (2016) Deep Dialogicality, Human Becomings, and Leaders as "Founders of Discursivity" Dialogue, Disruption and Inclusion; Qualitative Research in Management and Organization Conference (QRM), March 22nd-24th, 2016, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Seikkula, J. (2002) Monologue is the crisis - Dialogue becomes the Aim of Therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28 (3), p. 283-284. Go to original source...
Seikkula, J. - Arnkil, T. E. (2013) Otevřené dialogy. Setkávání sítí klienta v psychosociální práci. Brno: Narativ. 220 p.
Trimble (2002) Listening with Integrity: The Dialogical Stance of Jaakko Seikkula. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28 (3), p. 275-277. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.