J. Except. People 2014, 3(1):65-81

Engaging students in school leadership: Creative approaches to empowerment

Jonathan Damiani
Nagoya, Japan, 090-9120-5309

This study examines how principals take their lead from students, and use student voice, to create more inclusive and responsive schools, and more responsible models of leadership. I consider issues of student agency and voice within four different public school settings. Further, I consider the challenges all students face, and the ways principals are preparing to address these challenges. In this study I address roadblocks to responsive leadership in urban, suburban, and rural schools using a cogenerative qualitative approach that principals, students, and researchers can use to create new dialogue and shared theories focused on improving both administrative function and the instructional programs of their schools. This approach has revealed a new shared theory which includes young students of various abilities in models of school leadership. Central to this theory is a call for principals and researchers to use more student-driven approaches, so that students can be empowered as learners and leaders in their own right.

Keywords: Educational Leadership, Student Voice, Inclusive Elementary Education

Published: December 11, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Damiani, J. (2014). Engaging students in school leadership: Creative approaches to empowerment. Journal of Exceptional People3(4), 65-81
Download citation

References

  1. Allen, W. (1983). Classroom management: students' perspectives, goals, and strategies. American educational research journal, 23(3), p. 437-459. Go to original source...
  2. Blase, J. & Blase, J. (1999). Principals' instructional leadership and teacher development: teachers' perspectives. Educational administration quarterly, 35(3), p. 349-78. Go to original source...
  3. Cook-Sather, A. (2009). Translation: an alternative framework for conceptualizing and supporting school reform efforts. Educational theory, 59(2), p. 217-231. Go to original source...
  4. Cooley, V. E. & Shen, J. (2003). School accountability and professional job responsibilities: a perspective from secondary principals. NASSP Bulletin, 87(634), p. 30-34. Go to original source...
  5. Creech, S., & Bliss, H. (2001). A fine, fine school. New York: Joanna Cotler Books/HarperCollins Pub.
  6. Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). Race, inequality and educational accountability: the irony of 'no child left behind.' Race, ethnicity and education, 10(3), p. 245-260. Go to original source...
  7. DiPaola, M. & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2003). The principalship at a crossroads: a study of the conditions and concerns of principals. NASSP Bulletin, 87(43), p. 43-65. Go to original source...
  8. Elden, M. & Levin, M. (1991). "Cogenerative learning: bringing participation into action research," In W. F. Whyte (ed.), Participatory action research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Go to original source...
  9. Fullan, M. (2008). The six secrets of change: what the best leaders do to help their organizations survive and thrive. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  10. Gentilucci, J., & Muto, C. (2007). Principals' influence on academic achievement: the student perspective. NASSP bulletin, 91(3), 219-236. Go to original source...
  11. Gossen, D. (1992). Restitution: Restructuring school discipline. Chapel Hill, NC: New view publications.
  12. Isaacs, J. et al. (2012). Kids' Share 2012: Report on federal expenditures on children through 2011 (Research Report). Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/projects/kids_share.cfm
  13. Lambert, L. (1998). Building leadership capacity in schools. Alexandria, VA: Association for supervision and curriculum development.
  14. Leithwood et al. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. Minneapolis, MN: Center for applied research and educational improvement. Go to original source...
  15. Leithwood et al. (2006). Successful school leadership: what it is and how it influences pupil learning. Nottingham: DFES publications.
  16. NCES (2010). National Center for Education Statistics, Digest of Education Statistics, 2010 (13), Chapter 2. U. S. Department of Education.
  17. Portin et al. (1998). Introduction to the special issue: characteristics of the secondary principalship. NASSP, 87 (2), p. 1-8. Go to original source...
  18. Portin et al. (2003). Making sense of leading schools: a national study of the principalship. Seattle: Center on Reinventing Public Education, University of Washington. Go to original source...
  19. Powell, D. et al., (2009). Impact of No Child Left Behind on curriculum and instruction in rural schools. The Rural Educator, 31(1), p. 19-28. Go to original source...
  20. Quinn, D. M. (2002). The impact of principal leadership behaviors on instructional practice and student engagement. Journal of educational administration, 40(5), p. 447-467. Go to original source...
  21. Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  22. Shultz, J. J. & Cook-Sather, A. (2001). In our own words: students' perspectives on school. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  23. Schneider, E. (1996). Giving students a voice in the classroom. Creating a climate for learning 54(1), p. 22-26.
  24. Spillane et al. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: a distributed perspective. Educational researcher, 30(3), p. 23-28. Go to original source...
  25. Teddlie, C. & Reynolds, D. (2000). International handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Routledge Falmer.
  26. Walker, J. (2010). Reorganizing leaders' time: does it create better schools for students? NASSP Bulletin, 93(4), p. 213-226. Go to original source...
  27. Waters et al. (2003). Balanced leadership: what 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement. Aurora, CO: mid-continent research for education and learning.
  28. Wilson, J. T. (2011). Students' Perspective on Intrinsic Motivation to Learn: A model to guide educators. A Journal of the International Christian Community for Teacher Education, 6(1), p. 224-41.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.